A method for computing general automorphic forms on general groups
نویسنده
چکیده
The purpose of this note is to describe a method for computing general automorphic forms. I have carried out only limited computational tests so far, and have not discovered any new automorphic forms using it. However, the method does identify some lifted cusp forms on GL(3) and until recently was the only general method to compute an automorphic form on a higher rank group. It generalizes the methods of Hejhal (e.g. [7]) and others for Maass forms on GL(2), but does not require Whittaker or Bessel functions. Aside from trying to compute some of the same objects, this method is otherwise unrelated to the cohomological methods developed by Ash and others which use geometric data to compute special types of automorphic forms. I shall begin with a highbrow version of the method, and later explain its concrete manifestations and how they relate to existing methods. Every cuspidal automorphic representation for Γ\G, where G is a split reductive Lie group, has associated automorphic distributions as in [10]. These are viewed as objects in C(N), the distributions on the maximal unipotent subgroup N of G. Furthermore, they satisfy invariance properties, in particular under NΓ = Γ ∩ N . Using Fourier expansions on L (NΓ\N) and C (NΓ\N) (which can be computed, for example, using the method of co-adjoint nilpotent orbits), the distribution can be broken into several natural components. The invariance under the rest of the group Γ then provides many nontrivial
منابع مشابه
Transition exercise on Eisenstein series
[1] Despite occasional contrary assertions in the literature, rewriting Eisenstein series, as opposed to more general automorphic forms, to make sense on adele groups is not about Strong Approximation. Strong Approximation does make precise the relation between general automorphic forms on adele groups and automorphic forms on SLn, but rewriting these Eisenstein series does not need this compar...
متن کاملTransition: Eisenstein series on adele groups
[1] Despite contrary assertions in the literature, rewriting Eisenstein series, as opposed to more general automorphic forms, on adele groups does not use Strong Approximation. Strong Approximation does make precise the relation between general automorphic forms on adele groups and automorphic forms on SL2 and even on SLn, but rewriting these Eisenstein series does not need this comparison. Ind...
متن کاملL Functions for the Group
The method of L functions is one of the major methods for analyzing automorphic forms. For example, the Hecke Converse Theorem gives an equivalence via the Mellin transform between holomorphic modular forms on the upper half plane and certain L functions associated to Dirichlet series, which have analytic continuation and functional equation. The classical theory of automorphic forms on the gro...
متن کاملAutomorphic forms: a physicist’s survey
Automorphic forms play an important rôle in physics, especially in the realm of string and M-theory dualities. Notably, the hidden symmetries of 11-dimensional supergravity compactifications, discovered by Cremmer and Julia, motivate the study of automorphic forms for exceptional arithmetic groups En(Z) (including their n ≤ 5 classical A andD instances). These Notes are a pedestrian introductio...
متن کاملAutomorphic Forms and Metaplectic Groups
In 1952, Gelfand and Fomin noticed that classical modular forms were related to representations of SL2(R). As a result of this realization, Gelfand later defined GLr automorphic forms via representation theory. A metaplectic form is just an automorphic form defined on a cover of GLr, called a metaplectic group. In this talk, we will carefully construct the metaplectic covers of GL2(F) where F i...
متن کامل